Paypal ($PYPL) - close to done correcting?

アップデート済
There are multiple ways to count the move up, I have two different possibilities on the chart. Either way, I think at this points it's enough to assume that was an impulse. On the correction side I propose a Zigzag, with the C wave as a contracting diagonale, that is missing the C-wave of the wave 5.

スナップショット

The volume profile shows very little volume between 55 and 58, so anything more than a tiny dip in that zone might very well lead to 55 and below.

スナップショット

Whether there will be a noteworthy retracement before the possibly last move down or not, we will have to see. It might just continue going down to finish. I'd be looking at 53-55 for a bottom, though the count will stay valid until around 47.
ノート
Getting there...

スナップショット

B wave might also not be done yet.

Anyway, still looking for under 55
ノート
It's always a bit of a challenge with diags. Can't really call them done too early and we're not at the point yet, where you can be really sure.

That being said, so far it played out pretty much as predicted and one can't deny that we have a good candidate for a low here.

スナップショット
ノート
I don't have a clear favorite here, but some possibilities I see:

a) A diagonale from the low:

スナップショット

b) ZigZag from the low with a diagonale C-wave or 1-2 followed by a second wave 1 as a diagonale

スナップショット

c) Two finished 1-2s and we're in wave 3 now of 3 now

スナップショット
ノート
Another possibility: A different diag, expanding instead of contracting:

スナップショット

Since the subwaves look like impulses then, this case wouldn't work as a C-wave, so if it's that, it would have to be two big 1-2s or even more extreme four 1-2s.

(Previously shown possibilities are generally, with slight adjustments, still possible though)
ノート
A bit tricky as far as a count goes.

Assuming the low is in, I'd be partial to a leading diag at this point of time:

スナップショット

Alternative would have the 1 one high earlier with a sideways wave 2 that might not be done yet:

スナップショット

Getting a clean subcount out of that 1 is a bit of challenge though.

Would look for another dip below 58$.
ノート
That dip below 58$ was delivered :)

Sticking with the two counts shown in the previous update under the "low is in" assumption:

1a)

スナップショット

On the lower timeframes you can get 3-swing structures out of the moves labeled W, Y and Z.

This count would allow for a finished corrective.

The yellow 2 might not be finished yet though - it could still be missing the C-wave down.

1b)

スナップショット

The move from the top, instead of a finish corrective, would also work as a leading diag, which for this count would be just the A wave.

2)

スナップショット

As mentioned in 1a) you can get 3-swing structures out of the swings from the top, so it would also work as an ending diag, possibly as a C-wave of some kind of flat wave here, which would lead to the same conclusions as 1a)


Some more lines for your viewing pleasure:

スナップショット

What? You want more lines that show relevance? Ok, ok... here you go:

スナップショット
ノート
Continuing where we left off. We moved further up as expected in all previously shown scenarios

スナップショット

In the white count we've only finished wave 3 of 3, in the blue count we've already finished the whole wave 3 (of the assumed impulse from the 55.80$ low).

Until we make a new high the bigger corrective (1b from the previous update is still on the table)

The level shown in the last image of the last update sure did show relevance:

スナップショット

Red box (orange horizontal) denied further movement, green box (red line) held the price before the bigger move up. We're now above a level cluster (orange box) - holding this would look good with the bullish counts of the first image. A loss of the orange box could lead to a test of the orange line from above, which would still fit into the blue count.
ノート
Couldn't have followed the blue count/path from the last update any better than this:

スナップショット

Most bullish interpretation would be 1-2 1-2 (continued blue/white count). On the other hand it could also be seen as a finished zigzag (orange). Needs to develop further from here to make any calls with more conviction.

Since the last move up looks very 3 wavish though, there's also the alternative of a contracting diag here:

スナップショット

This would allow for a longer/bigger correction from here on out, in which case a dip into some level clusters right under 60$ would look interesting:

スナップショット

Once we get more than a fake breakout into the 70s, I'd be looking for 85$-93$ for starters

スナップショット


Fibonacci Pitchforks gave some hints for resistance:

スナップショット
ノート
A bit too early to really call anything yet with conviction, but for the time being the diag count seems to be the more likely one (second image last update) and for now we got a bit of a bounce exactly from the predicted zone (third image last update):

スナップショット

I'd want to see at least a new local high to be happy with the bounce and for the bigger picture this whole corrective move could also just be the first actionary wave.

Outer pitchfork lines (last image from the last update) did also provide some support here:

スナップショット
ノート
One more slight sweep to kick out those that had a stop below the last low and up it went. Ultimately the shown zone still held and we went straight into some resistance levels around 67$:

スナップショット

What now?

Sticking with the diag from the 50$ low - countwise, for the most bullish case, we would have finished the correction possibly like this:

スナップショット

There are some alternatives, where the correction is not finished yet, for example as a flat like this:

スナップショット

or as a multi-zigzag, with a flat as an X-wave like this:

スナップショット

Time will tell, either way, on the short term, the 57$-60$ zone, shown almost two months in advance gave a decent 10%+ reaction.
ノート
Relevant levels as shown in the first image of the last update:

スナップショット

Countwise PA move very much according to the two first counts shown in the last update (second and third image):

スナップショット

For the impulse above, unless we get a noteworthy extension in wave 5, the current move would look a bit short for a wave 3, so it could be a 1-2 1-2 (either overall or just inside of wave 3).

The other proposed count was a sideways correction, here shown as a flat (could also finish as a different sideways correction):

スナップショット
ノート
Slightly different count from the previously proposed:

スナップショット

Wave 3 could be done already or give one more kick into that 92$ orderblock:

スナップショット

Elliott WaveVolume

他のメディア:

免責事項