PYRusdt
THERE is also on Binance
On timeframes, 4,6,12 hours, you can notice divergences, but it all depends on the cue ball, the bottom is there or not (whether the rsi divergences will work on the 4th and bottom or not).
Therefore, I assume the most likely reduction to 16.5, at least.
However, the correction scenario to 10 also takes place if the cue ball goes lower. At this level, at least a rebound looks more natural from the fibo values, as well as a "return" to the channel. Hidden divergences may form at this level.
Definitely, it's better to wait at least 16.5 for now.
On timeframes, 4,6,12 hours, you can notice divergences, but it all depends on the cue ball, the bottom is there or not (whether the rsi divergences will work on the 4th and bottom or not).
Therefore, I assume the most likely reduction to 16.5, at least.
However, the correction scenario to 10 also takes place if the cue ball goes lower. At this level, at least a rebound looks more natural from the fibo values, as well as a "return" to the channel. Hidden divergences may form at this level.
Definitely, it's better to wait at least 16.5 for now.
免責事項
これらの情報および投稿は、TradingViewが提供または保証する金融、投資、取引、またはその他の種類のアドバイスや推奨を意図したものではなく、またそのようなものでもありません。詳しくは利用規約をご覧ください。