Backtesting in Pine Script often gives idealized results, but real trading involves financing costs like SWAP charges and the impact of leverage. Ignoring these can lead to a misleading strategy performance.
✅ Use-case:
Forex swing trading
Overnight Index strategies
Leveraged day-trading
📌 Key Features:
Adjustable leverage (e.g., 5x, 10x)
Customizable SWAP cost (as % or fixed amount)
P&L adjusted after each trade entry/exit
Performance metrics reflect net of financing costs
💬 Question for the community:
How to integrate SWAP charges and Leverage (for Forex trading) into Pine Script to backtest a strategy? Have you found a more precise or automated method (perhaps broker feed integration)?
Let's improve Pine-based backtesting together.
Drop your ideas, techniques, or improvements below. 👇
✅ Use-case:
Forex swing trading
Overnight Index strategies
Leveraged day-trading
📌 Key Features:
Adjustable leverage (e.g., 5x, 10x)
Customizable SWAP cost (as % or fixed amount)
P&L adjusted after each trade entry/exit
Performance metrics reflect net of financing costs
💬 Question for the community:
How to integrate SWAP charges and Leverage (for Forex trading) into Pine Script to backtest a strategy? Have you found a more precise or automated method (perhaps broker feed integration)?
Let's improve Pine-based backtesting together.
Drop your ideas, techniques, or improvements below. 👇
免責事項
これらの情報および投稿は、TradingViewが提供または保証する金融、投資、取引、またはその他の種類のアドバイスや推奨を意図したものではなく、またそのようなものでもありません。詳しくは利用規約をご覧ください。
免責事項
これらの情報および投稿は、TradingViewが提供または保証する金融、投資、取引、またはその他の種類のアドバイスや推奨を意図したものではなく、またそのようなものでもありません。詳しくは利用規約をご覧ください。