2500-2900-3800-5500 DRAFT 7-2, 2420 IN 3 DAYS
Introduction - Ceremoniously, with conviction in due diligence and much more anticipation, Binary Forecasting Service, presents 2300, 2350, and 2400 in succession before this week is out. Continuing from DRAFT 7-2 and price action in the last hour, bulls responded to bears's apparent "overselling to 2253" with a spike to 2277. In which ferocious bears jumped on Michelle Bowman's speech to washout weak hands to 2250. Having broken down what that meant for intra-day trend technical damage, this is what Binary Forecasting Service's trend engine foresee for the next 3 days.
Event Markers - In chart above all the blue arrows are the remaining Fed speakers for this week. In regular English, that's called a "fully loaded" week. Forecasts can change, but Fed speakers are devious AF, SO BE CAREFUL! The singular big blue arrow is of course big dog Jerome Powell. The three black arrows in succession are ADP, initial jobless claims and the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, otherwise known as Non Farm Payrolls.
Details - To prevent misunderstanding, the "four targets" 2500 to 5500 are NOT ALL meant for this month. BFS trend engine thinks 5500 will arrive between October 2025 and February 2026. The yellow route in chart at top is outright favorite. The light blue route is PLAN B if base case fails to play out. This draft is one of many in a series that attempts to map both price and time accurately. From DRAFT 7-1, I still see 2500s in April AT THIS TIME. Since the route to 2400s has changed meaningfully, 2500s too may also change and have a dampening effect on the four targets ala 2400-2800-3600-5000. For back ground please see previous work in links below. Per the usual, will add more notes soon.
Event Markers - In chart above all the blue arrows are the remaining Fed speakers for this week. In regular English, that's called a "fully loaded" week. Forecasts can change, but Fed speakers are devious AF, SO BE CAREFUL! The singular big blue arrow is of course big dog Jerome Powell. The three black arrows in succession are ADP, initial jobless claims and the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, otherwise known as Non Farm Payrolls.
Details - To prevent misunderstanding, the "four targets" 2500 to 5500 are NOT ALL meant for this month. BFS trend engine thinks 5500 will arrive between October 2025 and February 2026. The yellow route in chart at top is outright favorite. The light blue route is PLAN B if base case fails to play out. This draft is one of many in a series that attempts to map both price and time accurately. From DRAFT 7-1, I still see 2500s in April AT THIS TIME. Since the route to 2400s has changed meaningfully, 2500s too may also change and have a dampening effect on the four targets ala 2400-2800-3600-5000. For back ground please see previous work in links below. Per the usual, will add more notes soon.
コメント:
b) in chart above, the bold line from 1981 crossing over 2011's high ...
c) is the reason why 2300s have been so delayed this last 3 weeks
d) serious people with serious money also see that THIS IS A DAUNTING TARGET LINE
e) but Binary Forecasting Service's proprietary trend engine says that the time is here
f) to challenge and "false break" this trend line
g) I've never liked the wording "false break" bc a break is a break
h) you can also "break back down" but whatever
i) so this week is the week and Sunday-Monday is the post-NFP rug pull check-down
j) the strategy here is like everywhere else, long going up and short going down
c) is the reason why 2300s have been so delayed this last 3 weeks
d) serious people with serious money also see that THIS IS A DAUNTING TARGET LINE
e) but Binary Forecasting Service's proprietary trend engine says that the time is here
f) to challenge and "false break" this trend line
g) I've never liked the wording "false break" bc a break is a break
h) you can also "break back down" but whatever
i) so this week is the week and Sunday-Monday is the post-NFP rug pull check-down
j) the strategy here is like everywhere else, long going up and short going down
コメント:
1:58 PM ET 2266.XX, this chart is from previous post last hour:
VXl9Bc7M
VXl9Bc7M
コメント:
コメント:
a) for chart above, remember:
b) the price for moving too fast is a rug-pull correction
c) this may happen a few more times before ADP tomorrow
d) especially if bulls move too fast
b) the price for moving too fast is a rug-pull correction
c) this may happen a few more times before ADP tomorrow
d) especially if bulls move too fast
コメント:
コメント:
2:12 PM ET and 2271.xx again
a) in the last hour in DRAFT 7-1
b) I said that bulls want vengeance... but if they move too fast
c) the risk of rug pull is very high
d) and it's 2272.xx as I type...
e) I don't trade daily, but for those that do BE AWARE
a) in the last hour in DRAFT 7-1
b) I said that bulls want vengeance... but if they move too fast
c) the risk of rug pull is very high
d) and it's 2272.xx as I type...
e) I don't trade daily, but for those that do BE AWARE
コメント:
f) for the record, I don't trade daily often
g) but when I am this EXTREMELY LEVERAGED, and I see a hard spike
h) I take some or a lot of money off the table LIKE WHAT YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO DO
I) ok.
g) but when I am this EXTREMELY LEVERAGED, and I see a hard spike
h) I take some or a lot of money off the table LIKE WHAT YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO DO
I) ok.
コメント:
j) so it's 2171.xx and the spike limit is 84 but THE USUAL ROUTE IS 62 FIRST
k) so if I see 62, I lever up again like I did at 54
k) so if I see 62, I lever up again like I did at 54
コメント:
l) 2:45, 68.xx, hold on 62 is too soon to be levering bc:
コメント:
m) ooh... 71.xx again, I gotta look at this
コメント:
n) WATCHOUT FOR SPIKE UP!
o) bulls are saying 2271 is not just getting even
p) they want more, but HOW HIGH??
o) bulls are saying 2271 is not just getting even
p) they want more, but HOW HIGH??
コメント:
r) spike ceiling was is 2284, but bulls want vengeance
s) so????
t) 2300!!
s) so????
t) 2300!!
コメント:
u) see these two lines?
コメント:
v) they line up with the two sets for bollingers that matter
1) the intraday spike at 2286
2) and day hard ceiling at 2297+
3) bears have had enough time to correct the spike but they have not
4) that means the favored moved is 2285 and if that doesn't the bulls
5) then 2295-2300
1) the intraday spike at 2286
2) and day hard ceiling at 2297+
3) bears have had enough time to correct the spike but they have not
4) that means the favored moved is 2285 and if that doesn't the bulls
5) then 2295-2300
コメント:
6) the big channel ceiling is 2305, just be aware
7) bulls have been oppressed, repressed, and suppressed long enough '
8) they want vengeance and they want blood!
9) LFG!!!
7) bulls have been oppressed, repressed, and suppressed long enough '
8) they want vengeance and they want blood!
9) LFG!!!
コメント:
10) BUT! this curve runs PAST NY CLOSE
11) so it looks like continuously up to end of after market at 5 PM ET
12) which would put the ceiling at 2300+
11) so it looks like continuously up to end of after market at 5 PM ET
12) which would put the ceiling at 2300+
コメント:
13) and what if ...
14) 2305 is not enough to satisfy the bulls demand for vegeance?
15) that has to be between 6PM ET (aftermarket reopen in U.S) and 10 maybe 11 PM
16) max pain for bears 2325 before the bulls quit
17) so it's 2274.xx as I type and there's three targets bulls want
1) 2285, 2300, and what looks like 2323
14) 2305 is not enough to satisfy the bulls demand for vegeance?
15) that has to be between 6PM ET (aftermarket reopen in U.S) and 10 maybe 11 PM
16) max pain for bears 2325 before the bulls quit
17) so it's 2274.xx as I type and there's three targets bulls want
1) 2285, 2300, and what looks like 2323
コメント:
19) bulls are back baby!!!
20) and this time we are not going any where!!!
22) at least until 2410
20) and this time we are not going any where!!!
22) at least until 2410
コメント:
3:46 PM ET AND 2276.XX,
a) remember, price do not move in a straight line
b) between now and 2325, you have to cross 2300
c) OBVIOUSLY SOME SELLING WILL HIT probably 15-20 pts of zig zag
d) example: 2303, 2987, AND THEN 2323
a) remember, price do not move in a straight line
b) between now and 2325, you have to cross 2300
c) OBVIOUSLY SOME SELLING WILL HIT probably 15-20 pts of zig zag
d) example: 2303, 2987, AND THEN 2323
コメント:
e) WAIT, 2323 IS NOT OBVIOUS
f) so... 2313...
g) to keep it simple, it's 2278.xx now
h) AND SHOULD GO 2300-2285-2315
I) THEN CHECK DOWN
f) so... 2313...
g) to keep it simple, it's 2278.xx now
h) AND SHOULD GO 2300-2285-2315
I) THEN CHECK DOWN
コメント:
m) no .. I don't know if 2313 is the top for tonight
n) there's no way to to know what happens after 2310
o) we have to play it by ear, but I think my first call for 2325 is more accurate
n) there's no way to to know what happens after 2310
o) we have to play it by ear, but I think my first call for 2325 is more accurate
コメント:
p) 4:08 PM 2276.xx in after market
q) there's enough time to get to 2297 before after market is done
r) com'on!!
q) there's enough time to get to 2297 before after market is done
r) com'on!!
コメント:
s) 4:19 PM, still 76.xx and stalling
t) all we have to do is hit 2285 and the rest should be a vertical move super quick
u) so it's not like regularly waiting for or 24 point move out of nowhere
t) all we have to do is hit 2285 and the rest should be a vertical move super quick
u) so it's not like regularly waiting for or 24 point move out of nowhere
コメント:
w) 4:26 PM ET still 76.xx, WE HAVE JUST ENOUGH TIME
x) but it SHOULD HAPPEN!
x) but it SHOULD HAPPEN!
コメント:
y) 2278.xx, I think it's going for it!, remember to get out at 2300
z) why? bc it's 2300, it's not like you won't get retrace the first time!
z) why? bc it's 2300, it's not like you won't get retrace the first time!
コメント:
z1) 4:36 PM and 2278.xx first rejection at 2280 new high, it will try again
z2) need to break 2285 and it should fly
z2) need to break 2285 and it should fly
コメント:
z3) 4:43 PM ET and still 79.xx, if it doesn't move it's going to be gap up when it reopens
z4) I hate those bc of so little reaction time allowed
z5) I'd rather have it now, but I'm not sure it has enough time now
z4) I hate those bc of so little reaction time allowed
z5) I'd rather have it now, but I'm not sure it has enough time now
コメント:
z6) 4:48 PM, 12 MIN TO GO and 20280.xx still have a chance .. com'on...
コメント:
z7) 4:59 PM ET 2280.XX, what a tease! ARRHGHHHGHHGHGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
コメント:
5:00 PM, aftermarket closed 2279,xx with futures at 2301.xx
a) ANNOYING AF!
b) I gotta take a break
a) ANNOYING AF!
b) I gotta take a break
コメント:
5:03 PM
c) that was such a college slut moment
d) we almost had her, panties off and everything.... argh......
e) ok so, base case is gap up and run to 2297-2305
f) IF NO GAP UP... THERE'S A DEAD LINE or it becomes a check-down
c) that was such a college slut moment
d) we almost had her, panties off and everything.... argh......
e) ok so, base case is gap up and run to 2297-2305
f) IF NO GAP UP... THERE'S A DEAD LINE or it becomes a check-down
コメント:
g) dead line is 10 MINUTES OR LESS for it to move up
h) and NO SWING DOWN MORE THAN 1 POINT
i) if it moves under 2078.5, THAT'S A PROBLEM! ...
j) why? because spike setups require perfection ...
k) once the setup is gone, it is gone
l) at best, it would fake out.. like ah pop to 2285 and then rug pull or somethign
h) and NO SWING DOWN MORE THAN 1 POINT
i) if it moves under 2078.5, THAT'S A PROBLEM! ...
j) why? because spike setups require perfection ...
k) once the setup is gone, it is gone
l) at best, it would fake out.. like ah pop to 2285 and then rug pull or somethign
コメント:
m) but we going up and up and up next 3 days,
n) it's hard NOT TO reach 2350 now
n) it's hard NOT TO reach 2350 now
コメント:
5:12 PM ET, TO ANSWER EVERYONE'S 2300 question below
a) no, not tomorrow, TONIGHT
b) we go in order of probability and that is:
1) open gap up and run to 2300
2) open NO GAP and simply spikes to 2300 in 20 mins (but must go up in first 7 minutes)
3) open NO GAP up, sideways, retrace to 2272 (then I don't know what next)
4) open NO GAP up, sideways, fake out to 2285, retrace, then move to 2300
c) so out of the four most likely 3, have us hitting 2300 before midnight
a) no, not tomorrow, TONIGHT
b) we go in order of probability and that is:
1) open gap up and run to 2300
2) open NO GAP and simply spikes to 2300 in 20 mins (but must go up in first 7 minutes)
3) open NO GAP up, sideways, retrace to 2272 (then I don't know what next)
4) open NO GAP up, sideways, fake out to 2285, retrace, then move to 2300
c) so out of the four most likely 3, have us hitting 2300 before midnight
コメント:
d) besides that it's less than 1%, futures just closed over 2300 first time ever
コメント:
6:05 PM 81.55 and not gonna happen.
コメント:
a) it's not going to be quick
b) that's what's going on
c) now the annoying version
b) that's what's going on
c) now the annoying version
コメント:
6:15 PM ET 2281.XX and I gotta take kids to sports...
a) I'm not sure what annoying version of this should look like
b) but again ODDS FAVOR 2300 TONIGHT
c) good luck
a) I'm not sure what annoying version of this should look like
b) but again ODDS FAVOR 2300 TONIGHT
c) good luck
コメント:
6:27 PM, by the time I am back this 2300 move will be over, but here's what annoying meant
a) we were setup for smooth move (all done in 20 min)
b) it moved late, so it's not going to be quick or smooth
c) it's 28 minutes already and it's gonna stall at 90-ish for a while before moving to 2300
d) remember, careful at 2300, bc you should get 15-20 pt retrace depending if it's
e) 2297 or 2305
a) we were setup for smooth move (all done in 20 min)
b) it moved late, so it's not going to be quick or smooth
c) it's 28 minutes already and it's gonna stall at 90-ish for a while before moving to 2300
d) remember, careful at 2300, bc you should get 15-20 pt retrace depending if it's
e) 2297 or 2305
コメント:
f) and there might not be second move after 2300
g) not obvious anymore
g) not obvious anymore
コメント:
h) if you play chart at top, there is a chance of it just following yellow path too
I) I don't think so (right now at 6:41 PM)
I) I don't think so (right now at 6:41 PM)
コメント:
7:47 PM, 2279.XX, I don't have time to look at this right now
a) so I can't handicap what the next move should be
b) while I still think it should hit 2300 first overnight
c) IT DOES NOT HAVE TO
d) it can still go down to 2265 and still be on time for 2400s this Friday
e) so be aware
a) so I can't handicap what the next move should be
b) while I still think it should hit 2300 first overnight
c) IT DOES NOT HAVE TO
d) it can still go down to 2265 and still be on time for 2400s this Friday
e) so be aware
コメント:
8:40 PM ET, 2285.XX, I still think it should go to 2300 first, but I get why now...
a) so originally, I said it was going to be 2297-2323
b) but then settled on 2300-2313, bc 2323 was not obvious at all
c) so if top is 2313, then first leg SHOULD'VE BEEN 2287, which it WAS
d) and top should be probably closer to 2311
e) how long?
f) about 3 -hours from now, closer to 3 hours
g) so BASE CASE FOR RIGHT NOW is 2311 by 12:30 AM ET (NY TIME)
h) but while it's favored to right now it is a conditional favorite
i) that means we need to see it break past 2288 soon
j) if it doesn't do it in the next 2 hours, then we have to seriously consider ...
k) the route in chart at top
l) it's a not a big difference overall bc both routes still target 2400s on Friday
m) it's JUST WEIRD if it doesn't go to 2300 from here first CONSIDERING THE CLOSE
a) so originally, I said it was going to be 2297-2323
b) but then settled on 2300-2313, bc 2323 was not obvious at all
c) so if top is 2313, then first leg SHOULD'VE BEEN 2287, which it WAS
d) and top should be probably closer to 2311
e) how long?
f) about 3 -hours from now, closer to 3 hours
g) so BASE CASE FOR RIGHT NOW is 2311 by 12:30 AM ET (NY TIME)
h) but while it's favored to right now it is a conditional favorite
i) that means we need to see it break past 2288 soon
j) if it doesn't do it in the next 2 hours, then we have to seriously consider ...
k) the route in chart at top
l) it's a not a big difference overall bc both routes still target 2400s on Friday
m) it's JUST WEIRD if it doesn't go to 2300 from here first CONSIDERING THE CLOSE
コメント:
9:36 PM ET 2279.XX it's going to NEITHER OF THOSE ROUTES
a) so what?
b) so a mix of BOTH ROUTES
a) so what?
b) so a mix of BOTH ROUTES
コメント:
c) not that's not true, bc it's not going lower
d) here
e) last night, before I went out I said it's going up AND I DON'T KNOW HOW
f) we're here again, in similar situation
g) I can only tell you we going up again
h) the exact route IS UGLY AF, makes NO SENSE right now
d) here
e) last night, before I went out I said it's going up AND I DON'T KNOW HOW
f) we're here again, in similar situation
g) I can only tell you we going up again
h) the exact route IS UGLY AF, makes NO SENSE right now
コメント:
コメント:
コメント:
a) for chart above, my best swing
b) I'm too tired to do anymore
c) to sum it up, STAY LONG unless you know what you are doing
d) our target now is 2350 (bc 2300 is so obviously going to hit some time soon)
f) and whatever the retrace at 2300 is... at 2350 IT MUST BE BIGGER!
g) good night
b) I'm too tired to do anymore
c) to sum it up, STAY LONG unless you know what you are doing
d) our target now is 2350 (bc 2300 is so obviously going to hit some time soon)
f) and whatever the retrace at 2300 is... at 2350 IT MUST BE BIGGER!
g) good night
コメント:
コメント:
10:40 PM ET, FOR THE RECORD:
a) DRAFT 6-5 keeps hitting this out of the park:
a) DRAFT 6-5 keeps hitting this out of the park:
コメント:
b) whiled DRAFT 7-2 (chart at top for this post) has 2 routes...
c) if we cant break 2350 on the second try ...
d) PLAN C?
e) is DRAFT 5:
c) if we cant break 2350 on the second try ...
d) PLAN C?
e) is DRAFT 5:
コメント:
9:17 PM 2286.XX becareful past 2294
a) bc of the route it took
b) it makes this look like a trap at 2294
c) if there can be such a thing as a trap at all time high
a) bc of the route it took
b) it makes this look like a trap at 2294
c) if there can be such a thing as a trap at all time high
コメント:
3:26 AM ET... 2273.XX mirror image rule says have a hard stop in place
コメント:
3:32 AM ET, bears of the LBMA selling off hard, triggering 2230 signal
a) as a rule, London loves to put a cap on gold runs
b) this is dangerous though
c) so this post is dead until I wake in the AM
d) I'm going back to bed
a) as a rule, London loves to put a cap on gold runs
b) this is dangerous though
c) so this post is dead until I wake in the AM
d) I'm going back to bed
コメント:
3:38 AM OMG ... TREND ENGINE FLASHING 2100 SIGNAL...
a) I killed all my longs just now at 2273
b) this is nuts ...
b) be careful!
a) I killed all my longs just now at 2273
b) this is nuts ...
b) be careful!
コメント:
3:44 AM ET... I HAVE A SPECIFIC SETTING SET FOR 3 AM ET SELL OFFS
a) because of their PROVEN HISTORY TO SELL SO CONSISTENTLY...
b) that the only explanation is manipulation
c) they can say whatever they want
d) the signal for 2100 FLASHED WHILE IT WAS STILL 2175
e) that's only 12 points of ALL TIME HIGH just hours ago
f) the signal got triggered because of '"IMPOSSIBLE TO EXPLAIN" counter-trend selling
g) that starts 1 HOUR after London opens
h) as this has historically been the reason for these things going down in the past
a) because of their PROVEN HISTORY TO SELL SO CONSISTENTLY...
b) that the only explanation is manipulation
c) they can say whatever they want
d) the signal for 2100 FLASHED WHILE IT WAS STILL 2175
e) that's only 12 points of ALL TIME HIGH just hours ago
f) the signal got triggered because of '"IMPOSSIBLE TO EXPLAIN" counter-trend selling
g) that starts 1 HOUR after London opens
h) as this has historically been the reason for these things going down in the past
コメント:
i) therefore...
1) this post and this series are all dead effective immediately
2) and while I cannot prove it bc I'm going back to bed ...
3) trend engine is CALLING FOR 2100 BY MONDAY 04/08
1) this post and this series are all dead effective immediately
2) and while I cannot prove it bc I'm going back to bed ...
3) trend engine is CALLING FOR 2100 BY MONDAY 04/08
コメント:
4) THEY ARE AIMING FOR THIS:
コメント:
5) this will put them at 2115 OR LOWER ON MONDAY!
コメント:
THIS POST AND ALL PREVIOUS WORK ARE DEAD EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY. HERE IS BASE CASE GOING FORWARD:
コメント:
04/03, 10:17 AM, and 2276.xx back from 2100 false alarm
a) first sketch:
a) first sketch:
コメント:
b) in chart above, we are in the process of correcting last night's technical damage
c) always at
c) always at
コメント:
d) 3 AM ET out of London
e) I've seen the best setup get destroyed and rug pulled
f) so I had designed that advance warning to pick up that selling at 3AM
g) it busted the setup
h) now we are correcting the setup into an arc with 2 tops
i) AND IT WILL FINISH BY 3 AM ET THURSDAY
j) there will be two highs
k) first ball park is 2315 and 2350
e) I've seen the best setup get destroyed and rug pulled
f) so I had designed that advance warning to pick up that selling at 3AM
g) it busted the setup
h) now we are correcting the setup into an arc with 2 tops
i) AND IT WILL FINISH BY 3 AM ET THURSDAY
j) there will be two highs
k) first ball park is 2315 and 2350
コメント:
10:22 AM ET - I make no apologies for cancelling when it was 2273 and recommended reentry at 2274..
a) with stops tight AF
b) you have to see what I see to understand why I did that
a) with stops tight AF
b) you have to see what I see to understand why I did that
コメント:
10:30 AM ET - No second top....
a) bears of the UK took out the second top
b) so it's only one top somewhere around 2320
c) AND THE CURVES have also changed to add more 2-way vol before a break of 2292
a) bears of the UK took out the second top
b) so it's only one top somewhere around 2320
c) AND THE CURVES have also changed to add more 2-way vol before a break of 2292
コメント:
コメント:
A) For chart above. Only the move to 2315 is obvious
B) everything else ... no idea
B) everything else ... no idea
コメント:
10:48 AM: 2310 in 4 hours
1) will that fix the curves?
2) no..
3) what will?
4) I don't know how it gets fixed
5) I've never seen it get fixed
1) will that fix the curves?
2) no..
3) what will?
4) I don't know how it gets fixed
5) I've never seen it get fixed
コメント:
11:52 PM, 2285.xx stalled by Fed speakers and they are not done until 1:30-2:00 PM.
a) so this thing is going to need few extra hours
b) whatever the case the only thing obvious is 2310 maybe 2320
a) so this thing is going to need few extra hours
b) whatever the case the only thing obvious is 2310 maybe 2320
コメント:
コメント:
コメント:
a) for chart above, stuff like that never happens....
b) right?
c) why would they?
d) it's not like the GOLD gods care about us
b) right?
c) why would they?
d) it's not like the GOLD gods care about us
コメント:
コメント:
コメント:
a) in chart above, I don't know if that would "fix our curves"
b) but odds of a second spike to 2350 would be real
b) but odds of a second spike to 2350 would be real
コメント:
12:38 PM ET.... one more speaker to go...
a) is it possible?
b) I have never seen this damage reversed
c) but why would it?
d) do we deserve?
e) why should we be so blessed?
f) because perfect setups break all the time
g) this one FAR FROM PERFECT
h) why should the GOLD gods give us more reasons to believe?
a) is it possible?
b) I have never seen this damage reversed
c) but why would it?
d) do we deserve?
e) why should we be so blessed?
f) because perfect setups break all the time
g) this one FAR FROM PERFECT
h) why should the GOLD gods give us more reasons to believe?
コメント:
コメント:
12:49 PM ET at 2292.XX and wrapping up Wednesday:
1) play chart at top
2) price is out of position vs the hi-light in a very critical place
3) I keep asking for a miracle run here...
4) TO CORRECT THAT POSITION
5) otherwise breaking 2350 is ... hard
6) as well said before my many...
7) 44-year trend lines just don't break easy
8) sorry about the overnight switch up
9) but I had to do it bc my trend enginge said so
10) when it was safe, I clarified it
11) other wise have a good day
1) play chart at top
2) price is out of position vs the hi-light in a very critical place
3) I keep asking for a miracle run here...
4) TO CORRECT THAT POSITION
5) otherwise breaking 2350 is ... hard
6) as well said before my many...
7) 44-year trend lines just don't break easy
8) sorry about the overnight switch up
9) but I had to do it bc my trend enginge said so
10) when it was safe, I clarified it
11) other wise have a good day
コメント:
1:17 PM BTW, we need 2325 and we need BEFORE NY closes
a) to have a fighting chance to save this DRAFT
b) meaning chart at top
c) if not, its going to be a headache I don't want later
a) to have a fighting chance to save this DRAFT
b) meaning chart at top
c) if not, its going to be a headache I don't want later
コメント:
1:53 PM, 2294.48, we have enough time but we have to move over 2305 now...
a) can't wait much longer
b) there's a clock on the overall move that it has to be on time
c) we still have time but we have moved now
a) can't wait much longer
b) there's a clock on the overall move that it has to be on time
c) we still have time but we have moved now
コメント:
d) typo... but we have "to move now"
コメント:
2:04 we need to get to 2303-2307 and sit there for about 20-30 min
a) why?
b) bc this move finishes that way, it allows the short-term trends to catch up
c) and after that push this to 2328 and then 20 pt drop
a) why?
b) bc this move finishes that way, it allows the short-term trends to catch up
c) and after that push this to 2328 and then 20 pt drop
コメント:
2:50 PM, it not going make it easy:
コメント:
a) in chart above the differences are:
b) the yellow was a double spike curving forward but bullish
c) the blue one is a run-away spike that is bearish bc it will hit whatever hard ceiling is
d) and go past it, then get massive rug pull
b) the yellow was a double spike curving forward but bullish
c) the blue one is a run-away spike that is bearish bc it will hit whatever hard ceiling is
d) and go past it, then get massive rug pull
コメント:
e) AND I DID NOT ILLUSTRATE THE RUG PULL ok?
f) so be aware
f) so be aware
コメント:
g) no.. it should not be like that either... too early... so.. ??
h) I am stumped
i) it's not obvious AT ALL WHAT THE SECOND MOVE SHOULD BE
j) so we should do 2328 and check down 20 first ...
k) move after that should one runaway but, should be a SEPARATE MOVE
h) I am stumped
i) it's not obvious AT ALL WHAT THE SECOND MOVE SHOULD BE
j) so we should do 2328 and check down 20 first ...
k) move after that should one runaway but, should be a SEPARATE MOVE
コメント:
3:00 PM NO... I don't know that..
a) I am stumped to what the shape should be
b) but I think it means we will hit 2350 before London opens
c) just watch out bc this is NOT BY THE BOOK MOVE
a) I am stumped to what the shape should be
b) but I think it means we will hit 2350 before London opens
c) just watch out bc this is NOT BY THE BOOK MOVE
コメント:
コメント:
a) in chart above, that makes THE MOST SENSE to me right now
b) bc it should have one runaway move THAT IS SEPARATE FROM THE FIRST MOVE
c) that's a wrap today
b) bc it should have one runaway move THAT IS SEPARATE FROM THE FIRST MOVE
c) that's a wrap today
コメント:
3:34 PM it's going to up but not like that
a) so this post has ended
b) I don't have a new draft or anything
c) but look up we should at least hit 2320
a) so this post has ended
b) I don't have a new draft or anything
c) but look up we should at least hit 2320
コメント:
THIS POST HAS ENDED. HERE IS DRAFT 7-3 GOOD FOR NEXT 12 HOURS.
UNDER BAN. To join discussion group (not channel, not a subscription), you can go here:
t.me/+qXv5d6B2SwhlNTMx
t.me/+qXv5d6B2SwhlNTMx
関連のアイデア
a) once again for those that are not aware: